Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Yafan Wang vs Lucrezia Stefanini Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wang vs Stefanini analysis and find out who is favored!
Yafan Wang vs Lucrezia Stefanini Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Wang 1 - 0 Stefanini
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wang has won 45.51% of points on their second serve, while Stefanini has won 48.52%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wang, in recent form, has won 51.31% of their opponent's second serve points, while Stefanini has won 62.87%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.87% and 40.56% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wang has saved 58.49% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stefanini has saved 55.06% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wang has won 70.49% of matches played (W/L 43/ 18), with Stefanini winning 55.74% (W/L 34/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wang has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 88% (W/L 14/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 43/ 38). Stefanini has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 88/ 49), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 7/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Wang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 79.49% of matches (W/L 31/ 8), where as Stefanini has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.46% of matches (W/L 22/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wang winning 1 times and Stefanini being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Wang winning 2 and Stefanini winning 0. The last match between Wang and Stefanini was at the W25 Antalya, 16-03-2022, First, Clay with Yafan Wang getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wang and Stefanini have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wang winning 0 times and Stefanini 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Wang winning 0, and Stefanini 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wang has played against opponents with an average rank of 212.18 while Stefanini has played against players with an average rank of 239.33.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wang has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stefanini has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wang has converted 40% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stefanini has converted 47.94% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
68
Rank
47
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
169
Rank
99
High
26
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
61% (342-217)
Career Total W/L
56% (288-226)
50% (12-12)
YTD W/L
52% (16-15)
$1,553,667
Career Prize Money
$381,557
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Yafan Wang | Lucrezia Stefanini |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:21:0 | 1:21:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (27/43) | 62% (31/50) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (18/27) | 32% (10/31) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (7/16) | 37% (7/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 58% (7/12) | 60% (3/5) |
| Return Points W% | 66% (33/50) | 42% (18/43) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Yafan Wang
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
18 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Yafan Wang | Lucrezia Stefanini |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (12/12) | 52% (16/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (28/28) | 52% (33/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (254/264) | 52% (298/270) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 58% (11/8) | 71% (5/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 43% (6/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0.03 |
| Aces Total | 65 | 7 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 77 | 75 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:31 | 1:36:10 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 171.71 | 243.29 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1068/1736) | 76% (1513/1987) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (674/1068) | 55% (838/1513) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (304/668) | 49% (230/474) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (86/215) | 48% (128/267) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (792/1818) | 48% (904/1872) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/3) | 50% (1/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 60% (6/4) | 50% (3/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (4/3) | 57% (12/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (12/24) | 52% (15/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (4/8) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 82% (11/9) | 88% (16/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 18% (11/2) | 6% (16/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 23% (13/3) | 13% (15/2) |
Yafan Wang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Dayana Yastremska
Player
Yafan Wang
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktoriya Tomova
Player
Yafan Wang
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yafan Wang
Player
Lin Zhu
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
89
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Yafan Wang
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katie Volynets
Player
Yafan Wang
85%
(
63 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
86
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Yafan Wang
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Diana Shnaider
Player
Yafan Wang
61%
(
74 of
122)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
46%
(
22 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
45%
(
55 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
106
Total Points Won
103
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yafan Wang
Player
Erika Andreeva
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
23 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yafan Wang
Player
Sara Errani
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yafan Wang
Player
Mai Hontama
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
72%
(
68 of
95)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
49%
(
37 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
95)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Lucrezia Stefanini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Talia Gibson
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Ankita Raina
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Anastasia Kulikova
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Elena Micic
75%
(
73 of
97)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
14
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
45 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
79)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Matilde Jorge
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katie Volynets
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve %
79%
(
49 of
62)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emiliana Arango
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve %
80%
(
48 of
60)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
90)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
29%
(
9 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
50%
(
35 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
51 of
90)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Vittoria Paganetti
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
31 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carole Monnet
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
82%
(
64 of
78)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Wang Vs Stefanini Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
